Fig 1: Trees and turf: a classically soil-compacted
horticultural environment – a kick in the guts of
the tree. The rhizosphere or soil/root interface
(the plant-stomach-lining) is the place where the
tree meets soil-life and exchanges plant sugars for
nutrients. Image: Cassian Humphreys
Cassian Humphreys looks to 2030 and beyond.
For most of us ‘organic’ has become more of a human buzzword than a descriptor for nature and natural process. Correctly used, the word relates to the nutrient-cycle and the passage of inorganic elements, as nutrients harvested from the atmosphere, that move or get synthesised into the bodies of plants, thus making those elements organic (a bio-element), and available to us.
Plants are at the forefront of the nutrient-cycle which supports all bodies. Though there are numerous nutrient cycles, carbon – the building block of physicality, transitioned from inorganic to organic by photosynthesis – is the most obvious one.
Plants link the atmosphere and the rhizosphere via their bodies. As Shigo told us, they are the living pumps – the generators that move life on earth. All they need to live long is light sufficient to their species, air, water, and bioactive-carbon. When we take away or tamper with any of those foundation needs, we literally kick them in the guts. When it comes to nutrient absorption, the rhizosphere, and our stomach lining, we share parallels. To support trees the way nature intended we need aerated soils, nutrient beds and plant systems to the dripline as a minimum. This protects and nurtures the structural root zone and the tree protection zone in ways arboriculturists fantasise about.
In conclusion
The backbone of this article is a rerun, far less the original chunk of science and references, but equally solid on the reason.
At the time I wrote the original I admit I was a bit pumped up with the story that followed on from Covid time, so there may have been some of my story caught up in that narrative. Still, as a piece, it was, and is, useful to highlight the reason why we arboriculturists need to be creating cold-processed, top-end mulches and composts.
I encourage you to re-read Land Care via Vegetation Management Part 1 in the June/July 2022 issue of The Australian Arbor Age. Part 2 was an introduction to the concept of Naturaculture and was Prime Creative Media’s first article from me: Soldiery, Adventure Riding and Arboriculture in the December/January 2023 issue.
Those past narratives explored my prediction that it will be our profession which will have the opportunity to unite the allied land-management stakeholders because of the need for bio-active carbon resources – a compost product range I believe we should be responsible for producing and making money from – as well as developing the microbiological mind behind the service, something that can only broaden our integrity as arboriculturists. I likewise consider we are being naive as tree- or land-care professionals if we think we can sustain our families into the future by clearing vegetation into cooked stockpiles that do nothing to restore soil health or support the natural cycle of biology. There will come a time when land clearing will be a thing of the past, especially if we help write the future. I solemnly pray that mainstream arboricultural education takes on the Naturacultural or conservation arboriculture principles I live by.
My next evolutionary step is to return to Britain for my first book launch and to partner with a historic estate to co-create my first Conservation Arboretum, and to co-fund such a venture via delivering Naturaculture-based education. In time I will be looking to achieve the same Downunder, hopefully in Canberra. Time will tell.
Finally
In closing, whether we create counter-arboriculture, non-sustainable tree culture, or we create conservation-arboriculture, we are still working with the same elemental resources of air, water, and carbon. We are still using manpower and a measure of machinery, though in the latter model I suggest we are working far more intelligently.